A useful measure to understand how each side of the tree
compares to the other is derived by using weighted averages. To do this, you need to determine first which
end nodes represent the high vs. low end node probabilities. Below is an illustration.
Once you group the nodes together into a left and right side
of the tree, if you want to see how well the end nodes separate each other in
terms of average probability, a weighted average is appropriate to use.
First, add the sum of the ‘0 event’ and ‘1 event’
populations for each node group. Then,
divide each n population by the sum for each event type respectively. Once you have these weighted for each node,
then take the n population for each node and multiply it by the respective
weights for each event type. Once you
have the weighted average populations for each node, they then can be put into
a formula for analysis. For example:
Sum(weighted average 1 events) / (Sum(weighted average 1
events + Sum(weighted average 0 events))
Here is an example with numbers…

Weighted average event 1% (nodes 7-10): 0.019394
Weighted average event 1% (nodes 5-6): 0.588547
Other notes:
·
These weighted average node percents can be
useful as summary statistics when presenting your tree results· Comparing weighted average node percents of one time period vs. another can be useful to understand how the probability of a given event (assuming you have good separation between averages) can vary from one period to another




